Filed Under:
Terrorism, Politics, Photoshopped

6 Responses

Readers are solely responsible for the comments they post. Comments do not necessarily reflect the opinion or approval of Blogs of War or John Little.

---

---

1. Photoshopping The New York Times--Blogs of War Says:
   June 24th, 2006 at 3:49 pm

   […] I just sent her mine. You can find it in the Blogs of War Gallery. No Comments so far | Trackback Link Leave a comment Comments do not necessarily reflect the views of Blogs of War or JohnLittle. Off-topic, excessively profane, or racist comments may be deleted. Comments will not be deleted on political or ideological grounds. Comments that contain physical threats or information about potentially illegal activities will be forwarded to the proper authorities. Please engage your brain before you hit the submit button. […]

2. Rhymes With Right Says:
   June 24th, 2006 at 4:41 pm

   Less Dangerous than The New York Times

   Michelle Malkin posted some WWII posters supporting the war effort. I picked one from a collection of posters I’ve used with my classes, and so offer my Photoshopped contribution to the condemnation of those who care more about the next…

3. The New York Times - The Bank Data Story--Blogs of War Says:
   June 24th, 2006 at 4:42 pm

   […] Related: Blogs of War Gallery - New York Times - Exposing U.S. Intelligence Operations Michelle Malkin - Blabbermouth Posters […]

4. The New York Times Bank Data Story - America at war blog Says:
   August 15th, 2006 at 1:40 pm

   […] Related: Blogs of War Gallery Blabbermouth Posters […]

5. Blogs of War » The New York Times Runs to Ruth Ginsburg Says:
   November 25th, 2006 at 11:36 pm

   […] Michelle Malkin has been all over the Times both on her blog and in the mainstream media. I’m just barely recovering from my post-turkey coma while she’s in full attack mode. She even dug up one of my earlier NYT photoshops in today’s post. I think we both find it hard to believe that this story doesn’t spark more outrage given our current security issues - we are at war. Michelle’s appeal: The NYTimes’ refusal to cooperate with the feds to find illegal leakers in these counterterrorism cases deserves to be on the front page. Spread the word. […]

6. Moore-costigan Says:
   December 29th, 2006 at 12:38 am

   I guess it is a matter of human instinct, we must have an enemy to demonize: Be the Germans-Japs- Russians and of course now the Muslims, or is it the terrorists. Call it the enemy of the month. it seems to be coming through Mother’s milk. I am curious, who will be next, after the Muslims. My guess, is the Chinese.

Post a Comment